June 20, 2024
Science

Exploring the Data Terrain of Environmental Chemical Toxicity

Exploring the Data Terrain of Environmental Chemical Toxicity

In the vast realm of chemicals permeating our environment, only a fraction undergoes comprehensive toxicological evaluations, underscoring the pressing need for strategic prioritization in testing. To confront this challenge head-on, various organizations, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), are forging ahead with chemical screening and prioritization programs. Central to these endeavors is the systematic compilation of dispersed toxicology data—a critical step towards identifying candidates for screening and prioritization.

Sources of Insight: The ACToR Initiative

Enter ACToR (Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource), a pioneering effort amalgamating data from over 200 public sources, including esteemed entities like the U.S. EPA, National Institutes of Health, and regulatory bodies across Canada, Europe, and Japan. Within ACToR’s expansive repository lie invaluable insights ranging from chemical structures to in vitro assay results and comprehensive toxicology summaries.

Unveiling the Toxicity Data Landscape

Drawing from ACToR, we delve into the toxicity data landscape for a subset of 9,912 environmental chemicals earmarked for scrutiny under the U.S. EPA’s ToxCast screening program. Among these chemicals are high-and medium-production-volume substances, pesticide components, and drinking water contaminants. Our analysis reveals that a significant proportion of these chemicals possess at least limited toxicity summaries, with a notable subset having undergone rigorous evaluations in esteemed databases.

Towards a Paradigm Shift: Rethinking Toxicity Testing

The magnitude of chemicals under regulatory purview, estimated to exceed 75,000, presents formidable challenges to traditional toxicity characterization methods reliant on extensive animal testing. In response, alternative approaches are gaining traction, such as the tier-based strategy proposed by the International Life Sciences Institute/Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (ILSI/HESI) and the visionary vision outlined by the National Research Council (NRC) for novel in vitro toxicity assessment techniques.

Navigating the Data Gap

Despite strides in toxicity assessment methodologies, a significant data gap persists, with many chemicals lacking substantial toxicological data. In the United States, for instance, an estimated 30,000 chemicals are in widespread commercial use, a figure mirrored in the European Union’s REACH program. This stark reality underscores the urgent need for more efficient and comprehensive toxicity determination approaches.

A New Era of Prioritization: In Vitro Screening and Beyond

In light of the impracticality of traditional animal testing for the vast chemical inventory, in vitro screening emerges as a promising avenue for assessing chemical toxicity on a broader scale. Programs like ToxCast epitomize this shift, leveraging high-throughput screening assays to prioritize chemicals for detailed analysis based on predictive toxicity signatures.

Charting the Course Ahead

As we navigate the complex terrain of environmental chemical toxicity, strategic prioritization and innovative toxicity assessment methodologies are paramount. By harnessing the collective wisdom and collaborative efforts of stakeholders, we can bridge the data gap and pave the way towards a safer and more sustainable future.

Navigating the Chemical Landscape: Understanding Priority Sets

In the realm of chemical evaluation, strategic focus is key. With this in mind, we’ve directed our attention towards specific categories of chemicals, each with its unique significance in environmental and human health considerations. Let’s delve into the intricacies of these priority sets and the methodologies underpinning their selection.

Defining the Scope: Target Chemicals for Analysis

The regulatory purview of the U.S. EPA spans a vast array of chemicals, necessitating meticulous prioritization for further evaluation. We’ve honed in on chemicals that exhibit bioactivity, are prevalent in production or usage, or pose potential risks due to widespread human exposure. These criteria guide our selection process, encompassing both extensively studied compounds and those awaiting comprehensive evaluation.

The ACToR Initiative: A Data-Driven Approach

Central to our analysis is the ACToR system (Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource), a comprehensive database housing a plethora of publicly available information on chemical properties, in vitro assay results, and in vivo toxicology data. ACToR serves as our primary repository, facilitating a data-intensive exploration of environmental chemicals.

Exploring Priority Sets: The TSCA Inventory and Beyond

Our focus extends to several key sets of chemicals, each contributing unique insights into environmental toxicity:

TSCA Inventory and Inventory Update Reporting (IUR):

Originating in 1977, the TSCA Inventory serves as a cornerstone for the U.S. EPA’s Existing Chemicals Program, encompassing approximately 85,000 substances. We’ve integrated data from the 2002 public release of the TSCA Inventory, providing a foundational dataset for our analyses.

HPV Chemicals:

High Production Volume (HPV) chemicals, manufactured or imported in quantities exceeding 1 million lb/year, constitute a vital subset of our analysis. With a current list comprising 2,539 chemicals, HPV substances offer crucial insights into widespread chemical usage and potential environmental impacts.

U.S. EPA HPV Challenge:

An integral component of the HPV Program, the HPV Challenge list encompasses chemicals reported during the 1990 IUR reporting year. Our curated version comprises 1,973 chemicals, offering valuable data for comprehensive toxicity assessments.

US. EPA HPV Information System:

Comprising chemicals with robust summary data submitted under the HPV Challenge Program, the HPV Information System (HPVIS) provides a nuanced understanding of chemical toxicity. Our analysis incorporates information from 991 chemicals within HPVIS, enriching our dataset with detailed toxicity profiles.

Future Directions: Charting the Course Ahead

As we navigate the complex landscape of environmental chemical toxicity, our analyses pave the way for informed decision-making and targeted regulatory action. Looking ahead, we remain committed to expanding our scope, encompassing additional chemical sets and leveraging emerging methodologies to enhance our understanding of chemical hazards and risks. Through collaborative efforts and data-driven approaches, we aim to foster a safer and more sustainable environment for all.

In our endeavor to understand the intricate landscape of chemical toxicity, we’ve ventured into various categories, each shedding light on different facets of environmental and human health risks. Let’s delve into the specifics of these distinct chemical sets, unraveling their significance and contributions to our comprehensive analysis.

MPV Chemicals: Bridging the Gap

Distinguished from High Production Volume (HPV) chemicals, MPV chemicals occupy a crucial middle ground in chemical usage. Falling below the HPV threshold but exceeding reporting thresholds, these substances offer insights into moderately prevalent chemical usage. Our analysis encompasses 5,375 MPV chemicals from the 2002 IUR list, providing valuable data for nuanced evaluations.

Pesticides and Antimicrobials: A Multifaceted Spectrum

Within this expansive category lie a myriad of chemical substances, ranging from active pesticide ingredients to inert components. Our analysis delineates distinct subsets, including conventional pesticide actives, antimicrobial actives, pesticide inert ingredients, and compounds with food-use tolerances. With a focus on chemicals used against microbes and complex organisms, this category offers insights into diverse chemical applications and potential risks.

U.S. EPA TRI: Tracking Industrial Chemical Releases

Under the purview of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, the U.S. EPA compiles data on releases and transfers of toxic chemicals from industrial facilities. Our analysis incorporates 636 chemicals from the TRI, providing crucial insights into chemical emissions and their potential environmental impacts.

Drinking Water Contaminants: Safeguarding Public Health

With a focus on ensuring safe drinking water standards, the U.S. EPA identifies potential contaminants with adverse health effects. Our analysis encompasses chemicals tracked in the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisory Chemicals, as well as Candidate Chemical Lists, offering insights into chemicals of concern and their prevalence in water supplies.

U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office: Addressing Regional Concerns

In collaboration with the Great Lakes National Program Office, we’ve included a set of 429 candidate persistent, bioaccumulative toxicants (PBTs). These chemicals, designated by the GLNPO, offer insights into regional environmental challenges and priorities.

U.S. EPA HAPs: Mitigating Airborne Hazards

Under the Clean Air Act Amendments, the U.S. EPA reviews a list of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) with potential adverse health effects. Our analysis encompasses 185 chemicals under review, highlighting airborne hazards and their implications for public health.

EDSP Chemicals: Assessing Endocrine Disruption

Recognizing the importance of assessing endocrine-disrupting chemicals, our analysis includes 73 chemicals listed for screening under Tier 1 of the U.S. EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP). These chemicals offer insights into potential impacts on hormone systems and reproductive health.

ToxCast Phase I Chemicals: Harnessing High-Throughput Screening

As part of the U.S. EPA’s ToxCast program, we’ve included 309 unique chemicals undergoing high-throughput screening, primarily pesticide active ingredients. These chemicals pave the way for predictive toxicity assessments and prioritization for further evaluation.

Comprehensive Toxicology Reference: A Holistic Approach

To round out our analysis, we’ve incorporated data from the Toxicology Reference Database (ToxRefDB) and the U.S. EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). These databases provide comprehensive toxicology data, enriching our understanding of chemical hazards and risks.

Charting the Course: A Unified Approach

With a total of 9,912 chemicals across various categories, our analysis offers a holistic perspective on chemical toxicity. By synthesizing data from diverse sources, we aim to inform regulatory decisions and advance our understanding of environmental and human health risks. Through collaborative efforts and data-driven approaches, we strive to safeguard public health and promote environmental stewardship in the face of complex chemical challenges.

Leave feedback about this

  • Quality
  • Price
  • Service

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video

Add a Comment





1 star 2 stars 3 stars 4 stars 5 stars